Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are genetically identical to their parents. While cloning is often referred to as an unnatural process, it occurs quite often in nature. Identical twins are clones, for example, and asexual creatures reproduce by cloning. Artificial human cloning, however, is both very new and very complex.
The first artificially cloned animal was Dolly the sheep. She was a successful attempt at cloning after 277 unsuccessful embryo plantations. As such, it is evident that even now the science of cloning isn’t very advanced. It is universally accepted that human life is worth more than that of any other animal. As such, the usage of cloning on humans raises a lot more ethical concerns than that on a sheep. There are two main reasons to clone humans (or human cells).
First, it can be used for stem cell research and, by extension, regenerative medicine. Now that’s a whole different debate but the gist is that a fertilized human embryo could be cloned to millions and those embryos can be used to regenerate cells in a diseased person’s body and cure them. A recent example was on September 12, 2014, when surgeons at the Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation Hospital in Kobe, Japan, transplanted a 1.3 by 3.0 millimeter sheet of retinal pigment epithelium cells, which were differentiated from iPS cells through Directed differentiation, into an eye of an elderly woman, who suffers from age-related macular degeneration. But since we are using live human embryos to alleviate the suffering of a living human, is it morally right? Would it be right of me to kill you if it made me healthier?
Second, it can be used for reproductive cloning. Impotent couples can use cloning to have a child of their own. This especially a danger area of cloning. 95-97% of attempts at cloning an entire animal fail. Considering the complexity of the human body, the failure rate is sure to be higher. Since the technology is still very primitive, the cloned person is sure to have a lot of health problem, lower life expectancy and most importantly, they can have serious mental health issues such as retardation etc. which will ultimately result in a much lower quality of life. Another thing to consider is the constant social mocking the person will face, which anyone who is “different” faces in our society.
Another problem with this whole set up is that research cloning will undoubtedly lead to a new exploitation of women. In order to manufacture enough cloned embryos to create a sufficient number of viable stem cell lines, scientists will need to obtain massive quantities of women’s eggs. To do so, women must be injected with superovulatory drugs and undergo an invasive procedure. The Washington Post reported recently that the side effects of the injections are abdominal pain and nausea; in 3 to 5 percent of cases hyper-stimulation of the ovaries occurs, causing severe abdominal pain, and on rare occasions surgery is required which may leave the patient infertile. Contrary to women who assume the risks associated with egg donation in order to undergo in vitro fertilization, women who take such risks for the purpose of research cloning would not be motivated by the desire to have a child, but often by the desire for financial gain. Indeed, Advanced Cell Technology pays a lot to each woman who donates eggs for their failed cloning experiments. It is likely that women of lower economic means will be exploited in this way.
In conclusion, while human cloning offers some advantages in the medical field, it has a lot of social and ethical drawbacks. Add to that the fact that it is very inefficient. Right now, any funding towards this cause would be unnecessary and that money can be used to do better things, like feeding the already living poor.
What are your thoughts on human cloning? Would you like to have a clone of your own? Would you have him/her cloned to your age or would you have a baby? Would you treat him/her as your sibling or as your child? Let me know in the comments section below.
I left the following post and it seems to have ended up in your spam folder. So, here it is again.
——————————————————————
Well… first rule of being human… you can’t contain the quest of human knowledge and progress by simply passing laws. Regulation might be a better place to start. But if you are the one with the crippling or fatal disease and you want to live… I am guessing you’d not want any prohibitions or moral interpretations on something that would cure you, whether it’s stem cells, spinoff applications of cloning, or manipulating DNA.
My only concern is the inadvertent introduction of some new disease onto mankind in tinkering with all this. It’s concern enough that as our population increases.. and it is by crazy proportions… that exotic diseases are coming and will be spread like wildfire. The ability to hide and survive won’t matter one bit.
But if we are looking for the next new frontier of human endeavor to take us to the brink of extinction….. artificial intelligence. Because there is no moral objection or biological interference no one is giving this much risk consideration. It’s one thing to presume a barrier to stem cell research and DNA manipulation is the complex laboratory and science knowledge required. But the development of artificial intelligence is simply programming and could very well be accomplished in a basement or garage, ala Bill Gates or Steve Jobs.
The essence of A.I. is for a computer to learn and apply that learning.. and ultimately interfacing with the human brain. Man is not a computer nor is man any level of perfection in applying only pure logic in decision making. Giving a computer programming to advance A.I. will very likely result the next World War, Hollywood has predicted reality before.. and the idea of a “Skynet” deciding to remove the imperfection that is mankind is not far off. The thing is… we cannot stop this research & development any more than we can with the biological tinkering. I have no answers… but given my current age, I will not be around to worry about any of this. My own kids are approaching their 40’s… they may be lucky not to experience the cloning or A.I. ramifications in their lives either. Grandkids? Yep.. likely they will.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, sorry about the spam. I’m not sure why WordPress did this. I would have unspammed anyway but since you’ve repeated the comment I’ll reply here itself.
What you’re saying is, scarily, very true. What my gripe with the subject matter was that there might be better ways to deal with diseases than cloning, and a lot of funding in the area won’t make much sense.
As far as AI is concerned, that’s a bit too far fetched, your grandchildren might not experience the entire ramifications of AI or cloning, and I believe neither will mine (and I’m only 23).
Also, you’re right about we not being able to stop the research, humans are curious by nature and one way or the other, they’ll keep researching (even using said AI to aide their research).
All in all, your points are valid, and expose the scary truth. Thanks for commenting and apologies on behalf of my spam filter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cloning of some parts of a human being makes me sense (e.g. health purposes), cloning an entire human being not so much…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly my thoughts. Although the way the embryos are used looks a bit fishy at best.
LikeLike
No, I could use a clone ahahahah
LikeLiked by 1 person
hehe and would she be your sister or your daughter?
LikeLike
Sister of course and she would do all my assignments, attend lectures and take the exams for me. While I sit home and watch dramas and blog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post is so gonna be useful for my GP exam! Thank you so much!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad to have helped. 🙂
What’s a GP exam anyway?
LikeLike
GP ( General Paper) is just a Cambridge Examination in which we need to write an essay on one of the given topics…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh. I didn’t know you’re from the UK.
LikeLike
Nah…I am from Nepal….but A- levels here, requires us take GP so…yeah…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s great. Do read up on my other essays too. I write on a variety of topics and I’m sure they’ll be of help to you.
LikeLike
Yeah sure! Thx again! 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
As we are aware of higher risks of losing the clone, according to psychology, we may have emotions attached with the clone by spending a short period of time with the clone. And aftermath will be distress if the clone undergoes some medical anomaly.
According to my point of view, cloning of parts of a human body makes sense.
An informative article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very true Kalyan. It affects the whole family (if that applies) of the clone. Human empathy is taken on a roll in such a matter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Human being are unique!I am not keen on cloning get but once again it is hard to judge we can have opinions and be firm in those until we are in the situation to chose ,then everything might change.I can say no to human cloning but would I have the same opinion if I would lose a child and could have it back?i don’t know,it won’t be the same all right but unfortunately I might be not see that.
So no,I don’t like the idea of cloning human beings but I can only speak for myself and in this very same moment .Sure I m instead keen on cloning human body parts and tissues as I think we all are born with our own personal genetic identity and our “parts” are made for our body so ideally would be better having “spare parts” then someone else ‘s.of course until this is not possible I m in favour of organ donation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Of course. I too would like to be an organ donor when I’m dead. What’s profound in your comment is that you admit that our opinions change with time and events that happen in our lives, which essentially is what makes us human. I hope no one loses a child, but hey, it’s the world, these things happen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately they do,but you know what death is part of life too.accepting it helps to cope with it.hopefully.
Lovely post by the way.
Enjoy your Sunday ❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey gem
Very interesting topic.. And many things I didn’t know about clonnnig I came to know after reading your blog thank you for that
It’s a very funny thing.. I’ll share, my cousin younger to me keeps telling me, I want a clone of you (as his wife) I say no no impossible never, no one can be…i actually wouldn’t want that.. .lol
After what all I read, it’s nonsensical to invest money in this and encourage this.. Its better to feed the poor for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your comment made me realize how creepy it would be to have a clone of my own satiate someone’s fantasy. I guess your cousin is still a kid? Because if he’s not then that is a very creepy thing to say.
LikeLike
Ya ya
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well that’s a relief.
LikeLike
He ain’t a kid though
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that’s not a relieving thought. Just my opinion though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are right gem, but that was earlier, now it has stopped
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whatever your views on this are SG, it’s not going to be stopped. Scientists will continue developing and before long charlatans will be involved. It is not a bright picture. My view, it shouldn’t have happened.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s a humbling thought Mr Bryan. While millions are being spent on creating a cloned brother, I can only express my views on my tiny little blog. Yet, there are a lot of mountains to be climbed for it to be a success and I think it’ll still take a lot of years before something truly terrible happens.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Usefull information and intersting to read.. thx..
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ve given me food for much thought!!
Very interesting and pertinent topic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pertinent indeed. I hope the food for thought is filling and nutritious and not just junk food. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
HaHaHa! That it certainly isn’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s God that revealed it to the Science World. It should not be banned but should be used positively.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Where there is so much money and power, can it always be used positively? Also, what might be positive to one can be negative to someone else, that’s why this is such a debatable topic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right. I know many people will support the perspective that it should be banned. While in my own standing, I still stand firmly aground that it should not be banned. Every knowledge gain should be used positively under every circumstance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish more people were like you Peter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks and have a nice day. Do keep on intimating us with good pieces of information. Do keep on blogging and succeeding!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The technology is boon and a curse at the same time. This was an interesting read. Thank you for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liked your post! And your website! Against cloning a complete human, growing skin or some other body part ok.. not people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the compliment and for the comment. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think what most of us don’t take into consideration is that if we take two clones (cloned, for the sake of saying that!) just yesterday, then 10 years later both will be 2 different persons, basing on their living style and accident. Only if they aren’t raised in the lab, of course. This is my thought about the ethics…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right. I kind of overlooked that. Thanks for the comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s just one of many other sides of the coin.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The real question is, can a coin have many sides?
LikeLike
It depends how you look at the coin. From a far away look, there are three sides. If you take a closer look, then all the small details, the writings, the numbers will reveal extra sides. The sides of the sides.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS0WPP8pOuqImcEx1gHj1hTnxuaUcBBDaZ4Pdt86J5lHPoHpGUu0w
:))))
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those are two different coins.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a very different post of yours. I want to share one thing that I have read about the designer babies, in which the parents could have babies with whatever traits that wish to see. I mean with high IQ, beautiful eyes. Though, this is not in so much process right now but the research is going on. And they say that if it became successful then, these babies will be many times powerful then an average human being in mental as well as physical strength. In othed words, they could even control the world like a dictator.Lolz.It would be a big blunder to give birth to such designer babies.Do read about them.
Anyways, well researched and well written article.😊😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the longest comment you’ve ever left on my blog. Thanks. 😀
Anyway I had overlooked this designer baby aspect, thanks for pointing it out. Right now, this is not a concern because cloning a normal human is difficult as it is, trying to inculcate specific traits will only complicate things further, although in future this might be a concern, well I’ll just wait to see that day, it’d be pretty interesting IMO. 😀
I’ll be sure to read up on such designer Bhelpuris.. Wait sorry I mean designer babies.
Thanks again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think there are definite limitations on how far the human genome can be pushed. Consider dog breeding: the more we try to improve for specific characteristics, the more other characteristics suffer. Assuming humans follow the same pattern, making a person “Super” in one area, they would become deficient in another. Mixed breeds in dogs tend to be hardier and smarter than pure breeds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I see you know your dogs, Sir! 🙂
LikeLike
Excellent article as usual. Keep up your good work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post and question. I think our technology and medical improvements are ahead of our ethical considerations. I am all for advances, but I think of the line from Spider-Man. “With great power, comes great responsibility,” is apropos. We need wiser minds than me to develop the ethical guardrails. Keith
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the comment Keith. Of course with great power comes great responsibility, the problem is, a lot of power corrupts a human’s mind and he doesn’t really act in a responsible manner so to speak.
Your point is valid, but difficult in practice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. We often seem to fall short of our ideals and what are conscious pleads us to do. Greed is too powerful a motivator.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A clone of me 😆 … I think one of me is enough to support. Anyway, I liked your blogpost. A well written article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have to tread with utmost caution when science involve any sort of experimentation on humans. Just because we can do something, doesn’t mean we should.
Successful human cloning would definitely bring up issues such as, do clones have all the rights of any human being or would they belong to the researchers or the person from whom s/he was cloned? How would clone be treated at each stage of development. Who would oversee the process? How would society react?
Another interesting point to me is that, as I understand it, adult stem cells have generated many treatments and cures while embryonic stem cells have not. There seems to be almost a lust to research embryonic stem cells when it seems much more beneficial to invest in adult stem cells. Would cloning increase the lust for embryonic stem cell research? Scientists often love to push boundaries.
One aspect of cloning I could get behind would be the cloning of individual organs. If we could grow an organ for transplantation instead of needing to find a match and harvest, that would revolutionize medicine. People in need of transplants could receive what would in essence be their own organs. So many lives could be saved.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Organ cloning is actually more sensible and successful yet in terms of cloning.
There are a lot of issues and I don’t think I see a long term solution yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great answer, Sonia! Just because we can does not always mean we should. I agree that cloning organs for transplant may be a good idea though. According to the Sumerian tablets, homo sapiens were lab created in the first place, and it took a long time to get it right. Sorry, I would have made this a seperate comment, but for some reason, there was no place for it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey thanks for commenting, I’m not sure why you were not able to comment on your own. I’ll have a look into it.
Also, insightful comment, gonna have a look at Sumerian teachings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It could be because the setting only allow for so many comments. There are a lot of good documentaries on YouTube. Gerald Clark has a lot of good videos. Zachary Stitchen (however you spell his name) was one of the first translators and he has several books. He is dead now. I have other links I could share with you about the pyramids, too. You have to be careful, though, because there are those on YouTube that are bit whacky… Just like with everything, the good, bad and ugly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve had posts with a lot more comments than this one, so I don’t think that’s the problem. Anyway, I’d check those videos out, thanks.
LikeLike
It’s interesting to me how much ancient peoples knew and/or suspected that we are only now rediscovering. Brain surgery, for example, or at least cutting open the skull to relieve swelling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s only a matter of time before cloning becomes routine. Humans have never stopped after they were able to conceive of an idea, regardless of the consequences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite true. There isn’t a full stop to this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another ethical point: While Dolly is always referred to as a “successful” clone, she actually suffered from a grab-bag of painful maladies and only lived to half the age of a normal sheep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be interesting to see an exact clone of myself. Nature vs nurture. How much different would that clone(me) end up? Would she end up having anxiety and depression, would she have my diseases and so on? I have always thought about that if I would have another childhood would I end up as a different persona? As in how much difference would have nature vs nurture do in my case.
But to the matter of cloning, I do not think it is ethical. There is so many things that can go wrong, for example malformations, genetic damage etc. Like the cloning of “Dolly” succeeded on the 277th try. The amount of 276 beings did not make it. That’s a quite low success rate.
We also have already way too much people on Earth. Well, my country is suffering from low birth rate, since, having a baby isn’t priority at the moment for people. If I remember correctly, the birth rate at my country is affected by two things now: financial situation and that “everything needs to be ready before having a child”.
Adding cloned people would put too much pressure on the already over-populated world.
But as a matter of cloning organs that could save people, I do not have anything against that. Organ does not have its own unique “self” or, as some people call, a soul.
Excellent blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have you read Masterminds? ( http://gordonkorman.com/the-books/series/masterminds )
It’s about an experiment that was created to solve the nature vs. nurture debate, and it involved cloning. It’s a little bit of a younger kid book, though. After what you wrote, I don’t know how realistic it is, because the odds of getting that many human clones right is pretty slim. Either way, it’s a good book and I’d love to know your opinion on that aspect of cloning.
LikeLike
I definitely think we should develop cloning technology so we can make replacement organs for ourselves, but unless I could transfer my mind to the clone’s brain I don’t see any useful reason to make full clones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rightly said.
By the way how did you come across my humble blog?
LikeLike
Oh, I just read a friend’s blog, check out the blogs of people who said interesting things, and wander around wordpress that way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
completely agree with you. The thought of designer babies,super humans and using beautiful infants for our own greed is just unethical beyond thought.According to me,what certain people call the greatest discovery in bio technology, can turn out to be one of the greatest destroyer.Countries like America should definitely spend some time changing their policies regarding such issues,which are causing world wide problems. Glad someone’s mentioned this 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very well laid out and easy to read
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nobody remembers Frankenstein the movie like 70 year olds. Humans aren’t meant for cloning unless you’re willing to settle for less than human or less than living. Great and scary discussion all at once!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Things like that freak me out, and I usually try to make myself not think about it for too long. Yes, there could be a lot of good to come of that, but all the bad that would come with it… No. Just no. But that’s just the skeptic in me talking. As long as humans remain evil, they will turn every potentially good thing into a bad one.
LikeLike
Absolutely! We have one Creator only…my humble opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! I love this. Hmmm, for medical reasons, yeah. Outside that, I really can’t deal. However, this is an amazing feed. I would love to feature this in my blog 🙂🙂🙂. With your permission
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh sure. Please go ahead and feature it. 😊
Also, no need to take permissions explicitly, you can share my work wherever and however you like, just credit me as the author, that’s all I ask.
LikeLiked by 1 person